Posts Tagged privacy

Digital Media Ethics: Privacy

“The Internet has great strength as a medium breadth, depth, reach, immediacy, interactivity but also serious drawbacks, among which none has received as much attention as the threat to privacy.” (Hong, et. al. 2005:1)

Privacy is a key issue when it comes to digital interactions, and is therefore of concern to the new digital media. Privacy matters present myriad ethical considerations for the new digital media. According to Ess (2009:12):Digital Media Ethics

“Privacy can be minimally defined as the capacity to control information about oneself. The new ability of others to record and quickly distribute information about oneself thereby decreases one’s control over such information.”

There are several ways in which new media decreases one’s control over personal information that raise ethical quandaries. Discovery of sources and information becomes easier with new media. For instance the majority of the population has a Facebook (the popular social networking site) account. Facebook holds many details about one’s personal life including: name, age, location, photos and much more. A journalist could use these details to track down and talk to a potential source, but should they? Hirst (2011:151) writes that:

“Facebook users have an individual responsibility to maintain their own privacy settings.”

Furthermore, New York times editor Craig Whitney states (Hirst, 2011:151):

“What people write on Facebook sites is publicly available information.”

But what of the person’s intent in sharing this information? When publishing this sort of information, even though it exists in the public sphere (especially if privacy controls are not properly used) most people think only of sharing the information with friends or acquaintances, not contemplating that it may be used as part of a news story. As an example of this, many television news broadcasts show a screen-shot of a deceased person’s Facebook profile in violent or suspicious deaths. This can then lead to harassing comments and photographs being posted on the deceased person’s Facebook profile. This in turn has a detrimental effect on family and friends who are already suffering. Although the information is publicly available, is it satisfactory ethically for journalists to use the information to their own ends?  Another consideration in relation to privacy is how the online media collect and store information about their readers. There are obvious ways of doing this such as subscription services where readers provide their name and email address, among other details.  There have been several cases of security breaches recently, including the Sony PlayStation network. If it is possible for a global technology company to be hacked, then nobody’s details are truly secure. The Sony PlayStation Network breach, among a few others recently, raised questions about whether companies should notify subscribers when their personal information has been compromised or the database has been breached (http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/privacy-crime-make-data-breach-notifications-mandatory-ck-93209 retrieved 16 May 2011). Although this is not a preventative measure, it should be part of any organisation’s ethical consideration when collecting private data. Another way of collecting user data online, which is less transparent, is the use of cookies that track general usage information such as session times, location, age, computer system used and more. The information gathered from cookies is then used by online publishers to sell and target advertising. Is it ethically responsible to employ user information (even though it is anonymous) which allows publishers to both sell and increase the price of advertising by offering highly targeted campaigns? It is important that online sites employing cookies to track their users ethically consider the privacy implications of doing so, especially as there are not yet any laws in place to govern or guide such practices. Having considered privacy in relation to the new digital media, some new and important issues have been discovered, however we have to ask, is this a new ethical issue in relation to the new media? Ethical issues relating to privacy have always been a concern to the media, for example when cameras became widely available, there were concerns regarding the publishing of photos and how this might compromise peoples’ right to privacy and in the gossip and tabloid news the personal lives of public figures has raised questions regarding privacy. Ess (20099: 96) writes that:

“Advances in technology tend to make us more vulnerable to privacy invasion.”

So although privacy is not a new ethical consideration as such, the issue of privacy in the new media presents new questions for ethical inquiry.

Stay tuned for the next post in the Digital Media Ethics series: Speed and Accuracy

References

Ess, Charles (2009). Digital Media Ethics. Polity Press: Cambridge.

Hirst, Martin (2011). News 2.0: Can Journalism Survive the Internet. Allen and Unwin: Crows Nest.

Hong, T., McLaughlin, M., Pryor, L., Beaudoin, C., & Grabowicz, P. (2005). Internet privacy practices of news media and implications for online journalism. Journalism Studies, 6(1), 15-28. doi:10.1080/1461670052000328177.

Related Posts:

, ,

No Comments

Facebook privacy and the social network fear factor

I’m the first to admit I’m totally addicted to social networks and online communities, when I talk to friends and family about my online involvement, they often worry that I have such a heavy online presence that anyone can discover all my dirty little secrets (not that I have any, of course). My mum told me a story of a friend’s daughter who didn’t get a job she applied for because the prospective employer did a search for her online and found her Facebook profile, which contained details they weren’t happy with (i.e. photos of her partying, when she was applying for a teaching position).

Padlock, security. Facebook frea factor, Fresh ChatThe fact is, these are unneccessary fears, most social networks have very comprehensive security and privacy settings. I’d like to use Facebook as an example of the security you can apply to your online presence.

Firstly, in regards to the story above the easiest way to keep your profile private is to ensure that your privacy settings restrict who can view your profile. The options include: My Networks & Friends, Friends of Friends and Only Friends. If you’re a member of the ‘Australia’ Network and you choose the My Networks & Friends options, there are 2.5 millions Australians who can see your whole profile. You can also choose whether or not you’d like your profile to appear in public searches (eg. Google).

It’s also important to check the settings for photos and videos when managing your profile, for example, do you want everyone to be able to see any photos or videos tagged of you? If not, change the settings. When creating photo albums on Facebook, the automatic privacy setting is ‘Everyone’ this doesn’t just mean all of your friends, it means EVERYONE on Facebook. I always change the setting to Only Friends so that only people I know have access to my photos.

Facebook has the option of creating Friends groups, so you can choose to have a ‘personal’ and ‘work’ group and limit what information is available to your colleagues. For example, you can restrict colleagues from being able to read your wall posts and seeing your photos.

There are endless privacy and security settings on Facebook, and all other social networks and online communities. As you add information to your profile think about who that information is available to and ensure your privacy is protected.

Related Posts:

,

No Comments